Birth Order
Several years ago a teacher in one of my workshops -- a woman I'd only just met that day -- jokingly but somewhat accusingly said to me, "You're a first-born child, aren't you?" When I questioned why she wanted to know, she at first refused to answer, instead repeating the question. When I finally admitted that I was indeed firstborn, she exclaimed, "I knew it! You're so inflexible!"
Wow. Up until that point it wasn't a word I'd used to describe myself. But with some honest introspection I could see that she was right. I was inflexible! And it turns out it's very much a trait of first-born children.
Since then I've had a fascination with the whole topic of birth order, and lately I've come across it a few times. On Tuesday it was reported that a new study has determined that first-born children get the most attention -- a lot more. According to the article, "...parents spend 30 per cent more quality time -- such as minutes spent on homework, meals, reading time or sports -- with first-borns than with subsequent children between the ages of four and 13....That works out to about 3,000 extra hours of quality time for oldest children, and seems to have an effect that continues throughout the child's life."
Joseph Price, a professor at Brigham Young University, where the study was conducted, says, "They score better on standardized test scores, have higher IQs, are more likely to go to college, have higher incomes later in life and they're less likely to engage in risky behavior."
Yikes.
What do you think? The article I read drew 41 responses from readers before it was closed to comments, and they run the gamut from total agreement to vehement opposition. What's been your experience of birth order, either as a child or as a parent? I'd love to hear.
And, oh, by the way, I've worked very hard on that flexibility thing since the teacher's comment. Now one of my favorite things is to smile when responding to a question about what I'd like to do and say, "I'm flexible!"




